| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
21. Sticky:Dev blog: A quick update from Team Security - Recap from Fanfest... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dirk MacGirk wrote: Anything can be argued to violate the EULA. The argument may not be right, but anything can be argued. Actually, they have a third choice: ban whatever they want and don't ban everything else that may or may not be similar o...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.14 04:54:02
|
22. Sticky:Dev blog: A quick update from Team Security - Recap from Fanfest... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dirk MacGirk wrote: Inputs versus outputs. Aids to decision-making that result in the player creating an input into gameplay, and an app that assists in making an input easier or faster are two totally different things. Apps such as the first f...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.14 03:57:58
|
23. Sticky:Dev blog: A quick update from Team Security - Recap from Fanfest... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
All we wanted was for CCP to repeal the change or at the very least, discuss the issue with us. Failing that, we take the enforcement of the EULA very seriously, so we are asking CCP about multiple programs that violate the EULA. EVEMon, Pyfa, EFT...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.14 01:56:32
|
24. Sticky:Dev blog: A quick update from Team Security - Recap from Fanfest... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dirk MacGirk wrote: Nah, you're just trolling. Badly. Or trying to one up Shadow in the "I have more question now than before" category. I have fingers, but that guy doesn't. Aren't fingers an advantage? Is CCP gonna ban fingers now? Can I use ...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.14 00:39:21
|
25. Sticky:Dev blog: A quick update from Team Security - Recap from Fanfest... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Peligro wrote: Dear ShadowandLight, I understand your frustration. I've seen your posts on pretty much every discussion forum on the internet talking about this exact topic. The EULA is designed to cover as many "situations" or scenarios a...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.13 22:16:29
|
26. Sticky:Dev blog: A quick update from Team Security - Recap from Fanfest... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
EvilweaselSA wrote: Nolak Ataru wrote: EvilweaselSA wrote: Nolak Ataru wrote: And finally, can CCP comment on the fact that NOBODY anywhere has yet to give a logical reason why this change was enacted? the reasons why input broadcas...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.13 19:58:12
|
27. Sticky:Dev blog: A quick update from Team Security - Recap from Fanfest... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
EvilweaselSA wrote: Nolak Ataru wrote: Can CCP comment on the situation evolving with their endorsement of a third party program that violates 6A2? Can CCP comment on the 5-boxer who was banned whilst not using any form of broadcasting? Can...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.13 17:21:53
|
28. Sticky:Dev blog: A quick update from Team Security - Recap from Fanfest... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Can CCP comment on the situation evolving with their endorsement of a third party program that violates 6A2? Can CCP comment on the 5-boxer who was banned whilst not using any form of broadcasting? Can CCP comment on the fact that Falcon still ha...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.13 17:10:17
|
29. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Eve Solecist wrote: This is frightening. Instead of letting it go and finding peace, you pointlessly argue as if it changed anything. You do not seem to realise that it won't, or you take things way too personal. Either way is it unavoidable to...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.13 12:34:50
|
30. EVE-O preview - multi-client preview / switcher - v1.15 - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Makari Aeron wrote: OK So here's the deal. EVE O Preview does NOT send any commends of any kind to the EVE client. It only uses Windows commands to make the EVE window the active window. It can resize the client window and re-position it which ...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.13 12:22:59
|
31. EVE-O preview - multi-client preview / switcher - v1.15 - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
1) If making VideoFX windows was indeed banned, CCP would be attempting to police the usage of your operating system and it's features as VideoFX utilizes Windows Aero to function. 2) There is no part of the speech that targets VideoFX. 3) 6A2 is...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.12 20:20:41
|
32. Sticky:Reserved #4 - in Wormholes [original thread]
Bump. Tinukeda'ya Naskingar so far owes me a G-Vexor. Anyone else want to make a wager?
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.12 20:17:11
|
33. Statement - in Wormholes [original thread]
So wait, how can we be sure anymore that you actually tried to push back the mass distance for WHs (which favored WH residents over nullsec for fights on holes or in holes) if you're going to join null?
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.12 20:15:34
|
34. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Trakow wrote: 1) So? That's the player's choice, like anyone else... 2) And what's the difference? All those things will cause havoc on any player, even with one account. 3) No, person A did not cheat. They're using in-game items and features c...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.12 14:05:58
|
35. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sarah Eginald wrote: I hope these changes might make it easier for smaller groups to take sov. Not because of superior force but lack of interest in the large powers to keep outer non crucial systems. An example would be say a non useful that d...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.12 13:26:44
|
36. EVE-O preview - multi-client preview / switcher - v1.15 - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: Please keep the discussion on topic. The legitimacy of this software has already been discussed and doesn't need to be again. Assuming the functionality of the software doesn't change, it is allowed in its current state. It...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.12 13:16:01
|
37. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rroff wrote: Completely off the wall rough idea but thinking about the idea of a bastion style module for delegation - as an aside it could have been extended to the rorqual with a "resource collector" style mining "fighter" (obviously not actu...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.12 00:43:14
|
38. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Trakow wrote: That IS what we're all talking about! Helenetor said 1 player with 10 accounts vs 10 players with 10 accounts(total), not 10 accounts each, only one account each. So 10 accounts on either side of the fight. Seems you and Jason Xad...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.12 00:27:58
|
39. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
He was comparing 1 fleet of 1 player with 10 ships to 1 fleet of 10 players with 10 ships total. This was something I covered in the ISBoxer essay to some extent and I disproved it there.
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.11 21:18:54
|
40. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance Part 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
MeBiatch wrote: Honestly if you guys can pull off 48 full fleets you win eve... do i think it will happen? no... most fleets i have seen from cfc is what like 5-6 full fleets? Still more than enough if we split those fleets into smaller grou...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.04.11 18:40:37
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |